General Information of Drug Metabolite (DM) (ID: DM003853)
DM Name
Ethanol
Synonyms
ethanol|ethyl alcohol|alcohol|64-17-5|grain alcohol|Methylcarbinol|Ethyl hydroxide|Ethyl hydrate|Tecsol|Algrain|Anhydrol|EtOH|Hydroxyethane|Alkohol|Jaysol S|Potato alcohol|1-Hydroxyethane|Ethanol 200 proof|Aethylalkohol|Aethanol|Absolute ethanol|Alcool ethylique|etanol|Denatured alcohol|Denatured ethanol|Fermentation alcohol|Tecsol C|Dehydrated ethanol|Alcool etilico|Alcohol, ethyl|Alcohol, diluted|Etanolo|Jaysol|Etylowy alkohol|absolute alcohol|Alcohol dehydrated|Alkoholu etylowego|Dehydrated alcohol|Ethyl alcohol usp|Synasol|Alcohol, anhydrous|Ethyl alcohol anhydrous|Alcohol anhydrous|Ethylalcohol|Alcohol, dehydrated|Denatured alcohol CD-5|Denatured alcohol SD-1|SD Alchol 23-hydrogen|Denatured alcohol CD-5a|Denatured alcohol SD-3a|Denatured alcohol CD-10|Denatured alcohol SD-17|Denatured alcohol SD-28|Denatured alcohol SD-30|Denatured alcohol SD-13a|Denatured alcohol SD-23a|Denatured alcohol SD-39b|Denatured alcohol SD-39c|Denatured alcohol SD-40m|Spirt|Ethanol, undenatured|Alcare Hand Degermer|Ethanol Absolute|Ethyl alcohol & water, 5%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 10%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 20%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 30%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 40%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 50%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 60%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 70%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 80%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 95%|Ethyl alcohol & water, 96%|Alkohol [German]|Aethanol [German]|Etanolo [Italian]|Alcohol (ethyl alcohol)|Hinetoless|Ethicap|Thanol|NCI-C03134|Desinfektol EL|Ethyl alc|Ethylalcohol [Dutch]|Anhydrous ethanol|Caswell No. 430|Ethyl alcohol and water|Alcohol, Absolute|FEMA Number 2419|Alcohol [USP]|Ethanol [JAN]|Ethyl alcohol, undenatured|C2H5OH|Ethylicum|Ethylol|alcohol etilico|Edible alcohol|Alcohol,ethyl|Infinity Pure|Aethylalkohol [German]|HSDB 82|CCRIS 945|Alcohol, Grain|Anhydrous alcohol|Ethanol Anhydrous|Ethyl alcohol in alcoholic beverages|Alcohol,dehydrated|FEMA No. 2419|SD alcohol 23-hydrogen|AI3-01706|Alcool etilico [Italian]|Etylowy alkohol [Polish]|Alcool ethylique [French]|Ethanol, dehydrated|SY Fresh M|Alkoholu etylowego [Polish]|Esumiru WK 88|SDM No. 37|NSC 85228|Anhydrol PM 4085|Sekundasprit|Alcoholum|Ethanolum|Ethyl alcohol, absolute|Ethyl alcohol, anhydrous|Ethyl alcohol (Ethanol)|Ethanol Vapor|Ethyl alcohol, dehydrated|Alcohol denatured|Alcohol (ethyl)|SDA 3A|Ru-Tuss Hydrocodone Liquid|ALCOHOL 5% IN DEXTROSE 5%|Alcohol, denatured|EINECS 200-578-6|C2H6O|Alcohol (USP)|Alcohol determination--alcohol|EPA Pesticide Chemical Code 001501|ABLYSINOL|Ethanol (9CI)|100C.NPA|IMS 99|Absolute ethyl alcohol|DTXSID9020584|UNII-3K9958V90M|CHEBI:16236|ALCOHOL DENAT.|Punctilious ethyl alcohol|SDA 40-2|3K9958V90M|Ethanol-1-13C (9CI)|DTXCID30584|Ethanol in alcoholic beverages|ALCOHOL 5% IN D5-W|CDA 19|HBN-1 COMPONENT ETHANOL|AVAGARD COMPONENT ALCOHOL|UNII-7528N5H79B|PM-6193-200|EC 200-578-6|ETHANOL COMPONENT OF HBN-1|AHD 2000|ALCOHOL COMPONENT OF AVAGARD|NSC85228|NSC-85228|CDA 19-200|Reagent Alcohol|B3324|Ethanol; Dehydrated Alcohol|8024-45-1|EOH|Ethyloxy Group|C2-H6-O|MFCD00003568|Ethanol denatured|Ethanol, Anhydrous|Ethanol Extra Pure|42845-45-4|68475-56-9|71076-86-3|8000-16-6|ETHANOL, ANHYDROUS (EP MONOGRAPH)|ETHANOL, ANHYDROUS [EP MONOGRAPH]|Lux|Oxydimethylene Group|Ethanol Absolute Bp|ETHANOL IN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (IARC)|ETHANOL IN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES [IARC]|68476-78-8|HYDROXYETHYL GROUP|Ethyl Alcohol, Denatured|Athylalkohol|Athanol|ASTM Method D5501 96% Ethanol QC Check Mixture in Ethanol|methyl carbinol|diluted Alcohol|Vodka|Alcohol,sda|ethanol-|Sd alcohol|Alcohol,denatured|Pennsylvania Residual Solvent Mixture 332 5000 microg/mL in Triacetin|undenatured Ethanol|Ethanolum anhydricum|QMHAIh|Alcohol [USAN]|Alcohol 95%|fermentation alcohol|Alcohol 190 proof|EAL (CHRIS Code)|ALCOHOL [VANDF]|ALCOHOL [HSDB]|ALCOHOL [INCI]|Ethanol, 99.8%|Ethanol, technical grade|Reagent Alcohol, 70%|Reagent Alcohol, 80%|Reagent Alcohol, 95%|(OEtH)|ALCOHOL [II]|CH3CH2OH|Dehydrated ethanol (TN)|ETHYLICUM [HPUS]|Ethanol, standard for GC|Ethyl alcohol; (ethanol)|ALCOHOL [USP-RS]|ALCOHOL [WHO-IP]|ETHANOL [WHO-DD]|ETHANOL [WHO-IP]|bmse000297|CHEMBL545|D00AMQ|ETHANOL (ANHYDROUS)|Ethanol, >=99.5%|Anhydrous ethanol (JP17)|ETHYL ALCOHOL [MI]|Reagent Alcohol, for HPLC|E7148_ALDRICH|Ethanol, analytical standard|(CH2Me(OH))|Ethyl alcohol (DOT:OSHA)|SD 3A|Ru-Tuss Liquid (Salt/Mix)|Ethanol, USP, 99.5%|ETHYL ALCOHOL [FHFI]|WLN: Q2|Ethanol, anhydrous, denatured|Reagent Alcohol, ACS reagent|ALCOHOL [ORANGE BOOK]|ALCOHOL,ETHYL [VANDF]|B3324 [LANGUAL]|Ethanol, p.a., 99.8%|Reagent Alcohol, reagent grade|SDM No. 37 (Salt/Mix)|GTPL2299|ANHYDROUS ETHANOL [JAN]|Ethanol, denatured (5% IPA)|Alcohol dehydrated, >=85.0%|Ethanol, technical grade, 93%|Ethanol, technical grade, 99%|CHEBI:17246|Ethanol, 95.1-96.9%|Ru-Tuss Expectorant (Salt/Mix)|ALCOHOL, DEHYDRATED [II]|ALCOHOLUM [WHO-IP LATIN]|ETHANOLUM [WHO-IP LATIN]|Ethyl alcohol (6CI,7CI,8CI)|ALCOHOL,DEHYDRATED [VANDF]|LTBB002977|Ethanol, technical grade, 93.8%|Ethanol, technical grade, 99.5%|ALCOHOL, DEHYDRATED [VANDF]|DEHYDRATED ALCOHOL [USP-RS]|Ethanol, >=99.5%, for HPLC|STR05604|EINECS 270-649-4|Tox21_202510|ALCOHOL 5% AND DEXTROSE 5%|NA1170|STL264245|UN1170|Ethanol 2000 microg/mL in Methanol|Ethanol, 95.0%, (190 proof)|Ethanol, p.a., ACS reagent, 96%|Ethanol, tested according to Ph.Eur.|Ethanol, USP, 70.0-72.0%|Ethanol, USP, 94.9-96.0%|AKOS009104571|Ethanol solutions (UN 1170)(DOT)|7528N5H79B|ALCOHOL 10% AND DEXTROSE 5%|DB00898|Ethanol 10000 microg/mL in Methanol|Ethanol, absolute, >=99.8% (GC)|Ethanol, UV HPLC spectroscopic, 95%|LS-1539|UN 1170|CAS-64-17-5|Ethanol, denatured, (UK IDA standard)|Ethanol, SAJ first grade, >=99.5%|USEPA/OPP Pesticide Code: 001501|Ethanol, JIS special grade, >=99.5%|Ethanol, p.a., ACS reagent, 95.0%|Ethanol, technical grade, 92.6-93.8|NCGC00091458-01|NCGC00091458-02|NCGC00260059-01|Reagent Alcohol, spectrophotometric grade|DEHYDRATED ALCOHOL [USP MONOGRAPH]|EOX|Q153|Ethanol, absolute, for HPLC, >=99.8%|Ethanol, ACS reagent, 99.8, 200 proof|Ethanol, JIS first grade, 94.8-95.8%|E1510|Ethanol, denatured, Spectrophotometric Grade|Ethanol, JIS special grade, 94.8-95.8%|FT-0625729|FT-0625731|FT-0625732|FT-0668048|Ethanol, >=99.5%, SAJ super special grade|Reagent Alcohol, anhydrous, <=0.003% water|Reagent Alcohol, anhydrous, <=0.005% water|ASTM Method D5599 Revised Oxygenates Mixture|C00469|D00068|Ethanol, >=99.5%, suitable for fluorescence|Ethanol, Alcohol Reagent, anhydrous, denatured|InChI=1/C2H6O/c1-2-3/h3H,2H2,1H|SR-01000944357|VOC Alcohol Mixture 40000 microg/mL in Methanol|Ethanol, puriss. p.a., absolute, >=99.8% (GC)|SR-01000944357-1|Ethanol, denatured (5 % IPA, 5 % n-propylacetate)|Reagent Alcohol, used for histology tissue preparation|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, for molecular biology|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, anhydrous, >=99.5%|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, for molecular biology|Ethanol 70%, denatured with 1% MEK, 1% IPA, 10 mg/L|Ethanol, absolute, >=99.8% (GC), sales not in Germany|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, ACS reagent, >=99.5%|Reagent Alcohol, 70%, used for histology tissue preparation|Reagent Alcohol, 80%, used for histology tissue preparation|SM - Human Serum samples (Quantitative analyte selection)|URN - Human Urine sample (Quantitative analyte selection)|1E37B0D2-6209-4B03-A57D-500F3223C2DA|Alcohol, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard|ASTM Method D4815 Ethanol/RFA oxygenate free gasoline 10% Wt|Butane/Ethanol Mixture 1000 microg/mL in Dimethyl sulfoxide|Ethanol, >=99.5%, suitable for absorption spectrum analysis|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, HPLC/spectrophotometric grade|Reagent Alcohol, 95%, Used for histology tissue preparation|Ethanol, p.a., ACS reagent, reag. ISO, reag. Ph. Eur., 99.9%|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, meets USP testing specifications|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, anhydrous, ZerO2(TM), >=99.5%|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, meets USP testing specifications|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 23A, contains Acetone|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 2B-3, contains Toluene|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 30, contains Methanol|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 3A, contains Methanol|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 23A, contains Acetone|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 2B-3, contains Toluene|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 30, contains Methanol|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 3A, contains Methanol|Alcohol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material|Dehydrated Alcohol, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard|Ethanol standards 10% (v/v), 10 % (v/v) in H2O, analytical standard|Ethanol, absolute, for gradient elution, sales not in Germany, >=99.9%|Ethanol, absolute, for HPLC, sales not in Germany1, >=99.8% (GC)|Ethanol, absolute, semiconductor grade PURANAL(TM) (Honeywell 17826)|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 140 proof, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 160 proof, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required|Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, ACS spectrophotometric grade, 95.0%|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 2B-4, contains Heptanes|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 2B-4, contains n-Heptane|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 2B-5, contains n-Hexane|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 35A, contains Ethyl acetate|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 190 proof, SDA 3C, contains Isopropanol|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 2B-4, contains Heptanes|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 2B-4, contains n-Heptane|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 2B-5, contains n-Hexane|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 35A, contains Ethyl acetate|Specially Denatured Alcohol, 200 proof, SDA 3C, contains Isopropanol|Alcohol Determination-Alcohol, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard|Dehydrated Alcohol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material|Ethanol Calibration Kit, ampule of 10 x 1.2 mL, certified reference material|Ethanol, absolute, reag.
Structure
3D MOL 2D MOL
Pharmaceutical Properties Molecular Weight 46.07 Topological Polar Surface Area 20.2
Heavy Atom Count 3 Rotatable Bond Count 0
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count 1 Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count 1
PubChem CID
702
Complexity
2.8
Formula
C2H6O
Canonical SMILES
CCO
InChI
InChI=1S/C2H6O/c1-2-3/h3H,2H2,1H3
InChIKey
LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
IUPAC name
ethanol
Toxicity Properties of This DM
Documented Toxicity Properties
Toxicity Class Unreported
Predicted Toxicity Properties
Physical and chemical properties LogP

The log of the n-octanol/water distribution coefficient.

LogP possess a leading position with considerable impact on both membrane permeability and hydrophobic binding to macromolecules. Therefore, LogP is widely used in drug discovery and development as an indicator of potential utility of a solute as a drug.

The predicted logP of a compound in the range from 0 to 3 log mol/L will be considered proper.

-0.104 TPSA

Topological polar surface area

In TPSA, PSA is estimated only from the syntype (topology) of atoms in the molecule, without considering the three-dimensional structure of the molecule, which is the origin of the name topological polar surface area.

The TPSA of a compound in the range from 0 to 140 will be considered proper, based on Veber rule.

20.23
Pfizer Rule: Accepted

Molecules with a high log P (>3) and low TPSA (<75) are likely to be toxic.

Pfizer infered the relationship between the physicochemical properties and toxicity of the drug from an animal tolerability (IVT) study dataset of 245 preclinical Pfizer compounds.Compounds with a high log P (>3) and low TPSA ( <75) are likely to be toxic.

(Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 18(17):4872-5. 2008)

Structural Characteristics ALARM NMR Rule

Molecules containing the reactivity-related thiol substructures are likely to be toxic.

The high-throughput screening (HTS) hit rate of reactive compounds was evaluated by NMR screening, X-ray crystallography and other biochemical and biophysical experiments, and then 75 thiol substructures for predicting reactivity were obtained by computational means for 2348 screening hit reactive compounds and 1156 reactive compounds obtained by La protein experiments.The molecule was matched to 75 reactivity-related substructures to obtain the information how many alarm groups the molecule contained and determine whether it was a thiol-reactive compound. Molecules with the thiol substructures are likely to be toxic.

(J Am Chem Soc. 127(1):217-24. 2005)

0 PAINS

Molecules containing the reactive substructures are likely to be toxic.

Pan Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) is one of the most famous frequent hitters filters, which comprises 480 substructures derived from the analysis of FHs determined by six target-based HTS assay. By application of these filters, it is easier to screen false positive hits and to flag suspicious compounds in screening databases. One of the most authoritative medicine magazines Journal of Medicinal Chemistry even requires authors to provide the screening results with the PAINS alerts of active compounds when submitting manuscripts.

(J Med Chem. 45(1):137-42. 2002)

0
BMS Rule

Molecules containing the reactivity-related substructures are likely to be toxic.

BMS's primary HTS data over the past 12 years was evaluated and analyzed to determine the correlation of a group of compound functional groups with Promiscuity, defined as a drug that acts with multiple molecular targets and exhibits different pharmacological effects.

(J Chem Inf Model. 46(3):1060-8. 2006)

0 Chelator Rule

Molecules containing the substructures associated with metalloprotease targeting are likely to be toxic.

The chelate substructure fragment library (eCFL) for targeting metalloproteinases was prepared and its effectiveness in screening metalloproteinase inhibitors was verified by analysis and fluorescence-based assay experiments, and 55 substructures associated with metalloprotease targeting were finally determined as alert structures.

(ChemMedChem. 5(2):195-9. 2010)

0
Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Rule

Molecules containing the Genotoxic substructures are likely to be carcinogenic.

By constructing a molecular structure dataset containing the corresponding Ames test data (mutagens and non-mutagens). The substructure of the dataset is searched, and then the toxic substructure obtained by using chemical and mechanical knowledge and statistical criteria is derived, and the new toxic substructure is obtained and approved, and finally the reliability of the verification set is verified. Molecules containing these substructures may cause carcinogenicity or mutagenicity through genotoxic mechanisms.There are 117 substructures in this endpoint.

(J Med Chem. 48(1):312-20. 2005)

0 Non-genotoxic Carcinogenicity Rule

Molecules containing the NonGenotoxic substructures are likely to be carcinogenic.

Through the analysis and verification of the existing molecular library or the molecular library mined by data, the list of non-gene carcinogenic substructures (SA) is obtained according to the computerized data mining analysis, and finally the reliability of the substructure is verified. Molecules containing these substructures may cause carcinogenicity through nongenotoxic mechanisms. There are 23 substructures in this endpoint.

(Mutat Res. 659(3):248-61. 2008)

0
Toxicity Model Prediction hERG Blockers

The possibility of causing cardiotoxicity.

The human ether-a-go-go related gene. The During cardiac depolarization and repolarization, a voltage-gated potassium channel encoded by hERG plays a major role in the regulation of the exchange of cardiac action potential and resting potential. The hERG blockade may cause long QT syndrome (LQTS), arrhythmia, and Torsade de Pointes (TdP), which lead to palpitations, fainting, or even sudden death.So build a model by collecting a dataset to predict whether a compound is a hERG Blocker.

The output value is the probability of being toxic, within the range of 0 to 1. 0-0.3: excellent; 0.3-0.7: medium; 0.7-1.0: poor.

(Brief Bioinform. 22(3):bbaa194. 2021)

0.027 (---) H-HT

The possibility of causing .hepatotoxicity.

The human hepatotoxicity. Drug induced liver injury is of great concern for patient safety and a major cause for drug withdrawal from the market. Adverse hepatic effects in clinical trials often lead to a late and costly termination of drug development programs.So build a model by collecting datasets to predict whether compounds will cause hepatotoxicity.

The output value is the probability of being toxic, within the range of 0 to 1. 0-0.3: excellent; 0.3-0.7: medium; 0.7-1.0: poor.

(Brief Bioinform. 22(3):bbaa194. 2021)

0.028 (---)
DILI

The possibility of causing liver injury.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has become the most common safety problem of drug withdrawal from the market over the past 50 years.So build a model by collecting datasets to predict whether compounds will cause liver injury.

The output value is the probability of being toxic, within the range of 0 to 1. 0-0.3: excellent; 0.3-0.7: medium; 0.7-1.0: poor.

(Brief Bioinform. 22(3):bbaa194. 2021)

0.044 (---) CAMES Toxicity

The possibility of causing mutagenicity.

The Ames test for mutagenicity. The mutagenic effect has a close relationship with the carcinogenicity, and it is the most widely used assay for testing the mutagenicity of compounds.So build a model by collecting datasets to predict whether compounds will cause mutagenicity.

The output value is the probability of being toxic, within the range of 0 to 1. 0-0.3: excellent; 0.3-0.7: medium; 0.7-1.0: poor.

(Brief Bioinform. 22(3):bbaa194. 2021)

0.02 (---)
Carcinogencity

The possibility of causing Carcinogencity.

Among various toxicological endpoints of chemical substances, carcinogenicity is of great concern because of its serious effects on human health. The carcinogenic mechanism of chemicals may be due to their ability to damage the genome or disrupt cellular metabolic processes. Many approved drugs have been identified as carcinogens in humans or animals and have been withdrawn from the market.So build a model by collecting datasets to predict whether compounds will cause Carcinogencity.

The output value is the probability of being toxic, within the range of 0 to 1. 0-0.3: excellent; 0.3-0.7: medium; 0.7-1.0: poor.

(Brief Bioinform. 22(3):bbaa194. 2021)

0.185 (--) Respiratory Toxicity

The possibility of causing Respiratory Toxicity.

Among these safety issues, respiratory toxicity has become the main cause of drug withdrawal. Drug-induced respiratory toxicity is usually underdiagnosed because it may not have distinct early signs or symptoms in common medications and can occur with significant morbidity and mortality.Therefore, careful surveillance and treatment of respiratory toxicity is of great importance.So build a model by collecting datasets to predict whether compounds will cause Respiratory Toxicity.

The output value is the probability of being toxic, within the range of 0 to 1. 0-0.3: excellent; 0.3-0.7: medium; 0.7-1.0: poor.

(Brief Bioinform. 22(3):bbaa194. 2021)

0.028 (---)
Full List of Drug(s) That Produce This DM By Metabolism
D-xylulose DR2093 Investigative Discovery agent

If you find any error in data or bug in web service, please kindly report it to Dr. Yin and Dr. Li.